Disputes in accounts receivable processes pose significant challenges for businesses. They consume valuable time, impact financial performance, and tarnish customer experiences. With 55% of AR professionals citing dispute management as their toughest task, it's evident that effective dispute resolution is crucial for maintaining financial health and customer satisfaction.
This article will delve into the intricacies of dispute management, exploring common challenges, steps involved, and strategies for optimizing the process to safeguard your receivables.
The most obvious thing to say about late invoice payment is that it impacts cash flow. Businesses need to be able to predict incoming revenue, and expenditure, often with a high degree of accuracy. They cannot do so if a high proportion of their invoices are rejected, queried, or delayed.
Invoice disputes can hinder payment completion and impede cash flow, making financial planning more challenging than it needs to be. It can lead to bad blood between customers and the business, potentially leading to loss of contracts and attendant revenue.
Common types of invoice dispute include:
Of course, in some cases, an invoice dispute might involve more than one problem. This is why it’s vital to both improve the quality of invoicing and develop a robust strategy for swift, amicable dispute resolution.
How common is the problem of late-paid invoices due to disputes or poor communication? One source reports that in the US between 39% to 45% of invoices are paid late (seven days on average). This volume of late payments can have a significant effect on cash flow.
In the US between 39% to 45% of invoices are paid late (seven days on average). This volume of late payments can have a significant effect on cashflow.
The process would be challenging enough if all customers raised a dispute as soon as they received their invoice. Sadly, this is not always the case. It’s a fact of human nature that many people will put off awkward calls or conversations until the last minute. Therefore, by the time a business learns about a disputed invoice, its payment may already be overdue.
The process of dispute management itself can be time-consuming too, often requiring complex cross-departmental investigations to find out what went wrong. Many departments’ data may be unhelpfully siloed, making these resource-intensive investigations even harder.
A further consequence of stored data is that it can lead to inefficiencies, inaccuracies, and delays in discovering the root cause of a problem. Sometimes the measures taken to ensure data security and privacy work against an AR department’s ability to ensure a speedy dispute resolution process.
At the other end of the conversation, the customer may prove elusive. It may be hard to obtain useful information or timely responses from them. If they fail to collaborate with an investigation, it can be very difficult to provide a satisfactory resolution. Any lack of collaboration will inevitably lengthen the timescale of the process and prolong the time to settlement.
Let’s now break down the process of dispute management, so that you can see where the inefficiencies lie, and identify opportunities for process improvement.
Here are the eight stages of dispute management, and the challenges they bring:
Historically, many of these stages required laborious manual processes, with AR analysts working rather like detectives, piecing together evidence from multiple sources, while painstakingly documenting the process to ensure maximum accountability and transparency.
Even in the best-case scenario, customers could receive resolutions weeks down the line, and accounts receivable departments would obtain payment significantly later than expected at the date of issue.
Analysts and AR professionals must find a way to streamline the process of dispute management, reducing the timescale for enquiries, learning from common mistakes and ultimately, improving AR performance by increasing the number of invoices paid on time.
A combination of procedural streamlining, and automation, should produce improved results while generating happier customers and less harried AR analysts.
Here are some of the improvements AR analysts can make by using a platform like Chaser for invoice management:
Tools now exist which can automate much of the process of root cause analysis, with flexible functionality, customizable escalation options, and dedicated workspaces. What might once have taken days or even weeks to track, can now be achieved in minutes or hours.
By putting all salient data in one place, such dashboards provide granular insight into dispute status and facilitate efficient resolution. AR analysts can prioritize enquiries better, by having complete oversight over the status of their tickets.
Misfiling or loss of information is much reduced when you can simply attach supporting documentation to disputes for immediate access and enhanced transparency. It becomes easier to prove to customers that their enquiries have been thoroughly investigated and follow-up queries are easier to answer.
One key use of automation is to set up escalation triggers based on service legal agreements (SLAs) to expedite resolution. This means that a problem need never become a crisis, because analysts receive alerts when due dates are imminent. Triggers can be scheduled according to a target timescale, a level of financial loss, or some other parameter.
Good AR platforms allow all disputes to be viewed in a single window for bulk actioning, minimizing manual effort and maximizing efficiency. This is also invaluable when preparing reports on team and process performance.
While software and its automation are wonderful labor-saving innovations, we mustn’t neglect the importance of good human interactions too.
Here are four simple rules for improving those person-to-person touchpoints, whether in emails, phone calls, or in person:
Dispute management doesn't have to be a nightmare. By embracing AR automation tools and optimizing your dispute resolution strategy, you can transform dispute management into a streamlined, efficient process.
Protect your receivables, mitigate financial risks, and enhance customer satisfaction by mastering dispute management and ensuring swift resolution.
By ensuring that disputes are handled efficiently, with automation replacing routine manual data input and retrieval, your timeline to dispute resolution can be shortened significantly, customer retention can be improved, and, vitally, cash flow protection can be optimized. Key to this approach working is the integration of an AR platform which draws together data from multiple departments, prioritizes tickets, and ensures all salient information and documents are kept together for easy recall.
A platform like Chaser can take the pain out of accounts receivable for SMEs, providing everything from SMS payment reminders to late payment prediction, payment systems, and debt collection services. Chaser fulfils the full AR timeline from credit checking of prospective customers to recovery and reconciliation.
Integrate Chaser’s suite of advanced automation into your AR procedures and gain immediate peace of mind and cash flow protection. Why not book a call to learn more, or dive right in with a 10-day free trial.